genetics

Marriage

Bad Genes: Promiscuity and Fidelity Are in Our DNA

We could debate why people cheat longer than we dissected what exactly counts as cheating, and now a new study has added another lame excuse: the tendency to cheat is genetically predetermined.

We could debate why people cheat longer than we dissected what exactly counts as cheating, and now a new study has added another lame excuse: the tendency to cheat is genetically predetermined.

The same gene linked to alcoholism, gambling, and thrill-seeking makes people more likely to cheat and have one-night stands. It's all related to a system of pleasure and reward that releases the feel-good neurotransmitter dopamine. Essentially, the higher the risk, the greater the reward, which in this case is pleasure.

But as the New York Times point outed earlier this year, fidelity takes work whether you're prone to straying or not. In fact, practice even makes faithful. Another study found men who practiced resisting temptations in virtual reality were better at resisting it in real life.

Weight Loss

Fake Food, Genes, and Body Shape: Weighing in With the News

Weight gain is sure a hot topic these days — check out what the latest studies say about how we gain weight and what might be the next fix for managing excessive eating.

Weight gain is sure a hot topic these days — check out what the latest studies say about how we gain weight and what might be the next fix for managing excessive eating.

  • Genetics linked to body shape and weight gain. As part of a new study, researchers looked at the DNA of 250,000 individuals and found genetic variations related to body shape and how the body stores fat. The findings scientifically explain what's been physically obvious for some time: people have distinct body shapes (hourglass, pear, apple, ruler, etc.). The study also found that apple shapes are more susceptible to health risks like heart disease or diabetes. With these new findings, doctors may be able to direct new ways that the body stores fat. Genetics isn't everything though — continue to be good to yourself by eating right and exercising.
  • Fake food capsules may help with weight loss. Tired of overeating and the weight gain that comes with it? Well, researchers in Canada are currently working on a capsule that will help takers feel full, which will help them eat less. The gelatin capsule is filled with biodegradable materials that work by expanding in the stomach. During a one-month study, four individuals took the capsules without reporting any issues. The participants also lost weight and felt less hungry throughout the day.

Source: A.D.A.M.

Eco

Would You Eat Genetically Altered Salmon?

This Fall, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will decide whether a new variety of genetically engineered salmon can be sold in supermarkets.

This Fall, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will decide whether a new variety of genetically engineered salmon can be sold in supermarkets. If approved, the fish would be the first genetically engineered animal that people could eat. The Atlantic salmon, developed by AquaBounty Technologies, borrows genes from a fish called ocean pout, and develops at twice the normal rate, growing to market size in 16 to 18 months rather than three years. Even if the FDA deems it safe and environmentally and nutritionally sound, it wouldn't become available for a few years. Still, it could open the floodgates for other genetic engineering of animals, which likely wouldn't be labeled as such. Where do you stand on the issue?

relationships

Don't Blame Genetics: Fidelity Can Be Fine-Tuned

What sounds like a BS excuse — that some men "just can't help it" when it comes to cheating — may have a basis in reality.

What sounds like a BS excuse — that some men "just can't help it" when it comes to cheating — may have a basis in reality. Recent research suggests that a so-called "fidelity gene" might determine whether men are likely to get married or have marital problems.

But the wandering eye isn't as predetermined as eye color: science is also uncovering proof that men and women can fine-tune their fidelity skills, strengthen their commitments, and have happier relationships as a result.

A story in Tuesday's New York Times examines several scientific studies that challenge our preconceived notions about what it takes to be faithful. In one, scientists studied more than 500 sets of male twins and how they reacted to the bonding hormone vasopressin:

[M]en who carried a variation in the gene were less likely to be married, and those who had wed were more likely to have had serious marital problems and unhappy wives.

Of course, the research focused only on marital stability, not fidelity, so the "fidelity gene" idea isn't fully formed. Plus there's a separate raft of research that suggests that people can change. For all the proof, read more

healthy living

Are You Destined to Have Your Mother's Body?

Like mother, like daughter, right?

Like mother, like daughter, right? When I look at old photos of my mom at my age, we look exactly alike. Some children resemble their parents so closely that there's no doubt in your mind that they're related. So does that mean a woman is destined to grow up to look like her mom, and inherit the same body type, whether it be wide hips, large thighs, or a flat tush?

One finding proved that apple-shaped bodies are more likely to be seen passed down through family trees than pear-shaped and thin frames. That's because it's not just your mother's genes you inherit, but also your father's. Since men usually store fat in their bellies, this body shape can often be passed on to his children.

Don't worry just yet if you're not too psyched about growing up to look like your parents. The good news is that although your inherited genes may determine up to 80 percent of your weight and shape, you're not destined to have a tire around your waist just because your mom does. Your environment and personal choices also play a major role. Another good point to bring up is that your mother's generation wasn't encouraged to exercise like women are today, so a regular exercise routine can make a huge difference in what your body looks like when you reach your mother's age.

Tell me, do you already see your mother or father's shape when you look in the mirror?

News

Genetics Could Trump Daddy Issues in Sexually Active Teens

The age at which you lost your virginity could be programmed in your genes.

The age at which you lost your virginity could be programmed in your genes. Though researchers have often suspected that having an absent father, a single mom, or sexually active single parents could lead teens to have sex earlier, genetics seem to play a larger role than previously thought.

According a new study published in Child Development, the average age at which teens with absent fathers lost their virginity was 15.28, compared to age 16.11 for kids whose fathers were always around. Children whose fathers were sometimes absent lost their virginity at an average age of 15.36.

The findings are based on a study of 1,000 cousins at the University of Oregon, and the familial relations of the subjects led to some other interesting conclusions. Namely:

The more genes the children shared, the more similar their ages of first intercourse, regardless of whether or not the children had an absent father.

This doesn't mean there is an "absent father gene," says University of Oregon's Jane Mendle. But the researchers did observe parental traits — such as impulsiveness, addiction, and "sensation seeking" — that led to earlier sexual activity in teens.

At what age did you lose it? And do you think your early sexual urges were genetically predetermined?

News

Are You Afraid of Spiders?

About four percent of the adult, American population has arachnaphobia — a fear of spiders — and of that percentage, women are four times as likely to be afraid.

About four percent of the adult, American population has arachnaphobia — a fear of spiders — and of that percentage, women are four times as likely to be afraid.

Researchers concluded that girls have a genetic predisposition to be afraid of dangerous animals like spiders. Coded into our DNA, apparently, is the desire to stay away from dangerous things and protect our children, where men are supposed to be risk-takers and generally less likely to be afraid of spiders. You know — they're the hunters.

The researchers' conclusion seems to be a huge leap to me, but then again, a lot of these studies feel that way! I happen to love spiders and think they're beautiful. If I see one — I consider it good luck and try not to accidentally squish it. Maybe I'm just Goth that way. What about you?

genetics

Is 23andMe For You?

Part of the fun of making a baby is the surprise of it all.

Part of the fun of making a baby is the surprise of it all. Expectant parents become giddy over the suspense — will it have his eyes or hers, be a boy or girl, have curly or straight hair? Some people find out the answers to the big questions around the 18-week ultrasound reveal while others keep it a mystery. For those who don't want to leave anything in question, there is the $399 23andMe genetic testing kit.

The simple spit test can reveal the genetic likelihood of hazel eyes versus blue or brown. For nearly that price, I think I'd want a portrait of the child. Oh wait, I already get some of those. I can think of a few better ways to spend that kind of dough and think the health benefits of the test (predicting diabetes, downs, etc.) would be discovered with traditional genetic testing, which is typically covered, at least partially, by one's insurance. To be fair, the test can tell someone details about the baby's ancestry which could be enlightening, interesting or even lifesaving. But to many, ignorance is bliss. Would you spend that kind of cash to determine your offspring's hypothetical genetic makeup or your own background?

Eco

Today's Produce May Be Nutritionally Deficient

As it turns out, modern-day fruits and vegetables may not be so good for you after all.

As it turns out, modern-day fruits and vegetables may not be so good for you after all. In this month's issue of HortScience, Donald R. Davis, a former research associate at the Biochemical Institute at the University of Texas, argues that the average vegetable found in today's US and UK supermarket could be anywhere from 5 to 40 percent lower in minerals, such as magnesium, iron, calcium, and zinc, than produce that was harvested 50 years ago.
Although vegetables may be larger, this doesn't mean they contain more (or even as many) nutrients. This is caused by what's called the genetic dilution effect, in which farmers' efforts to increase crop yields have actually led to lower levels of protein, amino acids, and minerals. Although the "dry matter," or the bulk of the commercial vegetable's size, is increasing, there is "no assurance that dozens of other nutrients and thousands of phytochemicals will all increase in proportion to yield."

Davis argues that efforts to increase the production of food has actually led to food that is less nourishing. Crops are now being harvested quicker than ever before, and therefore produce has less time to absorb nutrients. These farming practices have also led to soil mineral depletion, which adversely affects the nutrition level of crops.

What do you think of this news? Is there some validity to Davis's argument? Does it make you more inclined to buy organic vegetables?

News

Labeling Won't Be Required For Genetically Engineered Animals

Last Thursday, the Food and Drug Administration issued its long-awaited regulations on genetically engineered animals.

Last Thursday, the Food and Drug Administration issued its long-awaited regulations on genetically engineered animals. Its conclusion, after considering genetically altered animals? Consumer labeling will not be required for genetically engineered food.Currently, genetically engineered animals are being developed for the market, but so far none of the animals have been approved by the agency for marketing. Prior to entering the marketplace, the animals themselves will need to receive FDA approval, and be labeled as genetically altered. In contrast, food products derived from these animals will not need to be labeled.

Proponents of the practice argue that it will create livestock that grow faster, produce less toxic waste, are resistant to disease, and are generally healthier to eat. But opponents argue that messing with Mother Nature could have unintended consequences, such as altering the genetic structures of animals.

What do you think of this ruling? Do you think the Food and Drug Administration has made the right decision?

Source